The Phys­i­cists and Math­em­aticians have a fant­astic resource called arXiv. It’s a effect­ively a cent­ral repos­it­ory for Phys­ics / Maths papers. What makes it truly won­der­ful is that it’s open access, so if I want to read a paper on the math­em­at­ic­als of social strat­i­fic­a­tion, I just click on the rel­ev­ant link and decide how I want to read it.

I’m par­tic­u­larly happy because I’ve found a paper on xenoar­chae­ology which the author doesn’t start by wear­ing his under­pants on his head. Both links are from this week’s New Sci­ent­ist.

Why can’t archae­olo­gists or ancient his­tor­i­ans do the same thing? It’s a bit of a puzzle.

My guess is that Arxiv exists because Phys­i­cists are likely to be able to scoop each other with their work. Also their work can abso­lutely be built upon for future work. Much Ancient His­tory and Archae­ology is art. It’s improved by wider read­ing, but I don’t need to have read the latest pomo the­ory to work on my own pro­jects. Fur­ther tech­no­pho­bia is an endear­ing char­ac­ter quirk in the Arts rather than a sign of aca­demic incompetence.

I don’t think it’s a long term prob­lem. Research­ers who are more inter­ested in spread­ing their ideas than sup­port­ing estab­lished struc­tures will have greater influ­ence on suc­cess­ive gen­er­a­tions and there will be a move to open access pub­lish­ing, because research­ers who ignore it will be ignored.