The Physicists and Mathematicians have a fantastic resource called arXiv. It’s a effectively a central repository for Physics / Maths papers. What makes it truly wonderful is that it’s open access, so if I want to read a paper on the mathematicals of social stratification, I just click on the relevant link and decide how I want to read it.
Why can’t archaeologists or ancient historians do the same thing? It’s a bit of a puzzle.
My guess is that Arxiv exists because Physicists are likely to be able to scoop each other with their work. Also their work can absolutely be built upon for future work. Much Ancient History and Archaeology is art. It’s improved by wider reading, but I don’t need to have read the latest pomo theory to work on my own projects. Further technophobia is an endearing character quirk in the Arts rather than a sign of academic incompetence.
I don’t think it’s a long term problem. Researchers who are more interested in spreading their ideas than supporting established structures will have greater influence on successive generations and there will be a move to open access publishing, because researchers who ignore it will be ignored.