A Review of Methodology in “Biblical Entheogens” at Archaeoporn saves me the effort of writing a similar post. Basically the biological/psychological aspects might be sound, but there’s no real historical or archaeological context to the idea. Without that, as a historian or archaeologist, there’s no real value to the research. Archaeologyknits has written a thorough rebuttal of the claims, so I shan’t bother writing my own piece. I’d rather effort on something more interesting.
